Traditional companies and HR executives are facing one of the biggest challenges of the last 100 years: employees can no longer be convinced with bold advertising. They are more informed, fastidious and critical than ever before. How can companies under these new circumstances still reach their audience and convince them long term?
By returning to one of the most intuitive and effective methods of human communication since the very early days. After decades of communicating from the top down, the challenge now is to re-learn the art of storytelling. The aim is to meet employees at eye-level and to win them over for the ideas, values and visions of a brand. With storytelling, organizations can generate attention and build credibility.
With the number of applicants being in the five- and six-figure range, corporations are facing the challenge of attracting the right talents rather than just appealing to the many: potential employees need to suit both the job and the company. The building blocks of brand storytelling are excellent tools for transparently displaying your values and expectations and consequently finding the right match. The storytelling report of the DAX 30 career pages is therefore analyzing how well the biggest companies of the country are utilising the power of stories for their own employer branding.
For the analysis we have taken a close look at the predominantly German career pages of all DAX 30 companies. Subcategories were rated with a score between 0 and 2.
Is there a prominent vision / claim answering the applicant’s question of “why” (0-2) and is it geared towards growth needs (0-2)?
Are there clearly detectable and consequently communicated values? (0-2) How well are they reinforced with concrete arguments, examples or stories? (0-2)
How prominently are arguments for the company featured (why us)? (0-2) Is there a unique employment proposition? (0-2)
Are employees themselves telling their story or are they told about them? (0-2) How detailed and journalistic are the chosen story formats? (0-2)
How high is the visual component? (0-2) How emotional and unique are the images that are being used (houses vs. people, staged vs. candid, own handwriting, etc.)? (0-2)
Is the wording used in the texts easy and comprehensible? (0-2) Are phrases, technical terms and buzzwords used or concrete images and strong emotional terms? (0-2)
wdt_ID | DAX 30 | weighted overall score | Vision (factor 1.5) | Values (factor 2.0) | UEP (factor 1.0) | Story (factor 2.5) | Visual (factor 1.5) | Wording (factor 1.5) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Beiersdorf | 38,5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
2 | Deutsche Telekom | 37,0 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
3 | Henkel | 35,5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
4 | adidas | 35,0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
5 | Bayer | 34,5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
6 | ThyssenKrupp | 34,0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
7 | Allianz | 33,5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
8 | Siemens | 32,5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
9 | Merck | 32,0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
10 | HeidelbergCement | 31,0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Follow Us!